A Delphi consensus of cerebrovascular autoregulation monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury

Takeaway

  • Twenty-five consensus statements addressing the pathophysiology of impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) and its effect on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets and outcome resulted from the Delphi procedure.

Why this matters

  • There is a lack of a gold standard and prospective data regarding secondary brain injury risks, impact on care and outcomes of implementation of CA-guided management in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) treatment, leading to uncertainty.

  • The identification of multiple consensus statements addressing CA-guided management of patients with severe TBI highlights the need for prospective clinical studies examining the feasibility, safety and efficacy of this methodology in this particular cohort.

International Medical Press is a global provider of independent medical education. Its mission is to provide healthcare professionals with high-quality, trusted medical information with the aim of helping optimize patient care.

No responsibility is assumed by International Medical Press for any injury and/or damage to persons or property through negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, International Medical Press recommends that independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made. The opinions expressed do not reflect those of International Medical Press or the sponsor. International Medical Press assumes no liability for any material contained herein.